We mentioned Ray would be speaking in Iowa a few weeks ago. Check him out on video, courtesy of the NRCS page!
Many farmers are confused about gypsum sources. Are they all the same? Our testing has shown that like limestone, not all gypsum is the same. One of the newest “gypsum" sources to come on the market recently is Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) from coal.
Here are some excerpts from this long research paper by Western Kentucky University. My notes are in bold:
- Coal contains small amounts of toxic metals. Some of these metals are captured in FGD gypsum.
- Wet FGD technologies can remove highly soluble oxidized mercury (from burning coal); about 85%-90% of the mercury can be captured in wet FGD gypsum.
- Therefore, mercury content in FGD gypsum is of major concern in FGD by-products.
- Mercury is more volatile than other elements and can readily evaporate into the atmosphere.
- It has been reported that mercury in the soil can emit into the atmosphere and be absorbed by plants.
- Mercury in the soil also can be up taken by plants.
- When it comes to mercury distribution in plants, the mercury concentration in the stem is much lower than in leaves and roots. (Mercury is up to 6 times higher in the leaves and roots than stems.)
- When a plant defoliates, the leaves fall down, and mercury enters the soil and is absorbed by the plant’s roots.
- Mercury in the plant’s roots stays in the plant’s roots.
- More FGD added leads to more mercury in the soil. (30% to 300% depending on depth sampled.)
- Over dosage of FGD gypsum resulted in a negative effect on growth of tall fescue.
- Mercury could also poison the roots, leading to low yield.
- Plants may absorb mercury because the mercury size and valence state is similar to plant nutrients.
- It could be inferred that mercury penetrated into the subsoil and finally leached out of the soil.
- The mercury concentration in FGD gypsum is 300 ppb. The initial mercury concentration in the soil is 28 ppb. Mercury in seed is 65 ppb. (This means in a standard application of 1 ton of FGD you are applying 3# of Mercury.)
- One possible reason for the increase is that mercury species in FGD gypsum was in ionic form, and therefore is able to dissolve in the water
- Using water evaporation as a mode of transportation, mercury was released from the soil.
- With the increased addition of FGD gypsum, more mercury was dissolved in the water, and thereby more mercury evaporated into the atmosphere. (8-15% of applied mercury vaporized into the atmosphere. The higher the application rate the more that evaporated into the atmosphere.)
- FGD gypsum only affected the H+ concentration in the soil at massive doses, which is most probably due to unreacted CaCO3 in the FGD gypsum. (In this study (page 51) large amounts of gypsum raised pH significantly. This suggests the conversion of the limestone and sulfides to gypsum is not a stable conversion and could cause soils to be “over-limed” in already high pH soils.)
- In this field study, the FGD gypsum used had the same mercury concentration as that of mined gypsum.
- The mercury concentration of the whole stalk was higher in FGD gypsum plots than the mined gypsum plots.
- The FGD gypsum mercury may be more easily absorbed by the plant than mined gypsum.
I leave you with this... SuperCal SO4 is naturally mined gypsum and has no mercury in it! SuperCal SO4: proven performance, proven safety!
Yield Starts Here is a blog for farmers, focusing on increasing yield and profitability by focusing on the soil. It is managed by Craig Dick, the blogronomist and VP of sales and marketing at Calcium Products. Find other articles by Craig and guest writers at blog.calciumproducts.com.
It's that time of year - soil sampling season! These suggestions come from our friends at Midwest Laboratories, one of the largest soil labs in the U.S.:
Soil Sampling Suggestions
Sampling soils under very dry conditions may increase variability in soil test results. A couple of items to consider this fall:
1. Make sure you are able to obtain a good soil core for each sampling point. The soil probes may be difficult to get into the ground or difficult to get the complete depth desired. It is also possible that the core is powder dry and may not be the complete depth. Proper sample depth (6 inches minimum) is essential for calibrating fertilizer recommendations from laboratory results.
2. During dry conditions, exchangeable Potassium (K) levels can test lower than what is actually available. K fertilizer added is very soluble, as is the K in the plant residue. Without adequate rainfall, this K is not readily available to the plants and this is what the laboratory is testing for.
3. The soil pH can also be affected by dry field conditions. Soil pH could show slightly more acidic (.1 to .3 pH units) than expected/normal values. Even with these three potential issues, it is very important to analyze your soil in dry conditions to help determine the amount of nutrients left in the soil that the plants did not uptake because of poor growing conditions. A crop that is yielding half or less than expected will leave a significant amount of nutrients in the soil and residue, assuming the crop isn't being removed for forage. The organic matter, phosphorus, CEC and base saturations along with most of the micronutrients will not be affected by the dry conditions. Carry over nitrogen can also be a concern. The lack of yield combined with little moisture to leach nitrate may leave some pretty large amounts behind. If you are able to get a good core and a good representative sample, it is usually going to be okay to sample. You may also want to delay sampling until after a substantial rain event (@ 1 inch). Another option is to utilize proven historical yields to determine crop removal rates.